Showing posts with label Jamie Lee Curtis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jamie Lee Curtis. Show all posts

Sunday, January 27, 2013

"Halloween II": The Ideal Cut


The first time I ever had any true understanding of what post-production and editing meant on a motion picture was when I saw the TV version of "Halloween II" (1981).  Universal syndicated an alternate version of this movie to independent TV stations starting around 1984.  I saw it on the local KCOP Channel 13 in Los Angeles on Halloween of that year (it still plays frequently on AMC and can also be found on YouTube).  It was startling to see how different both versions of this film were.  Detailed descriptions of the differences between both versions can be found here and here.  In general, both versions follow the same storyline:  Moments after surviving her attack by Michael Myers in the first "Halloween" (1978), Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) is rushed to Haddonfield Memorial Hospital where she is under the care of the medical and nursing staff.  Meanwhile, Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasance) continues searching for Michael's whereabouts as the small town grows hysterical upon learning of the murders he has committed earlier in the evening.  Unbeknownst to all of them, Michael has followed Laurie to the hospital and begins systematically picking off the personnel and staff at the hospital until only Laurie is left.  The movie ends with a fiery confrontation between Michael, Loomis, and Laurie.


It's been documented through the years that producer John Carpenter was dissatisfied with the version of "Halloween II" that director Rick Rosenthal turned in.  In an effort to keep up with the vigorous slasher movie competition then in-vogue, which were much more explicitly violent than his original "Halloween" ever was, Carpenter supervised additions and reshoots where he added one murder, pumped up the violence in other scenes, and purportedly cut down on scenes establishing character development.  The TV version is purportedly closer to what Rosenthal had intended for this film.  One general difference between both versions of this film is that the theatrical cut of "Halloween II" moves fast, has some exciting and scary moments, but leaves you feeling cold.  Even though it's a well-made movie, especially compared to other slasher movies in the early 1980s made in the wake of the original "Halloween," it doesn't have the personality and heart of the original movie.  The first "Halloween" distinguished itself by creating a trio of teenage girls that the audience enjoys spending time with.  In the theatrical cut of "Halloween II," you never get to know the Haddonfield Memorial Hospital staff who are tending to Laurie.  As a result, the theatrical cut never quite generates the same level of suspense as the first film because you are never allowed an opportunity to care about these new protagonists.


All of that changes in the alternate TV version.  In this cut of the movie, you get to spend considerably more time with the hospital personnel who, in the other version, came across as mere ciphers.  This is not to say that they have become fully dimensional characters, but we now get a better sense of who they are so that their deaths and/or survival matters more to us.  In this cut of the movie, the additional scenes with head nurse Mrs. Alves (Gloria Gifford) allows her to come across less of a stern task master, and more as a hard-working professional who expects all the nurses under her supervision approach their work with the same level of maturity and high-standards that she brings to her work so that their patients can rest comfortably.  This is underscored by the little vignette, added to the end of the scene early in the movie when Laurie is brought to the ER, where Mrs. Alves draws the curtains as Laurie is being undressed and prepped for surgery, and orders the ambulance attendants out of the room.  We see how Mrs. Alves remains sensitive to Laurie's privacy and modesty.  We also spend more time with nurse Janet (Ana Alicia) so that we get a better sense of her mild hysteria and nervous disposition.  Because Janet in the TV version appears to be the only nurse who has any genuine sense of concern or doom about what may happen to them all, based on what Michael Myers has done earlier in the day, she becomes a more vulnerable and sympathetic character than she was in the theatrical version due to her heightened awareness.  Cliff Emmich's likeable security guard Mr. Garrett also gets a few extra scenes where he responds to the news reports of the teenagers murdered in the first "Halloween" by speculating that it must have involved youths under the influence of controlled substances.  This helps to better establish him as an old-fashioned, no-nonsense, traditional kind of guy.


Tawny Moyer's nurse Jill comes across as the most put-together, most professional of the younger nursing staff in the TV version, as the additional scenes help establish that she is the only one that Mrs. Alves does not scold in the course of the evening because she makes no mistakes.  Pamela Susan Shoop's appealing nurse Karen also benefits from the additional scenes.  In the TV version, she comes across as less of an irresponsible flake and becomes a more feisty, level-headed, and quirky individual.  Ford Rainey's Dr. Mixter, who virtually disappears in the theatrical version until Janet finds him dead in his office, has more scenes that help to establish his concern over whether he tended to Laurie's wounds properly.  The added scene where he is trying to reassure himself that he did all that he could in treating Laurie's wounds, and that her scar won't be that noticeable, allows the character a sense of humanity and vulnerability that wasn't there at all in the theatrical cut.  And Lance Guest as Jimmy, the sympathetic young ambulance attendant who is established as a potential love interest for Laurie, benefits in the TV version by virtue of the fact that the original, scripted ending of the film is reinserted in order to allow him to survive.  In the theatrical version, Jimmy appears to have died from head wounds sustained from slipping on Mrs. Alves's blood on the hospital operating room floor.  (More about this later.)  That version of the movie ends with the seeming sole survivor Laurie, desolate and alone, in the back of the ambulance as it takes her away.  In the TV version, Jimmy reappears in the back of the ambulance with Laurie, his head wrapped in bandage, but otherwise all right.  The sight of Jimmy alive brings Laurie to tears, as the TV version ends touchingly on a more upbeat, hopeful note.  (This gives the movie's use of "Mr. Sandman" over the end credits an entirely different nuance.  Rather than eerily underscoring how, as it does in the theatrical version, Laurie will remain forever haunted by her encounter with Michael Myers, this TV version ending makes the song ironically upbeat, and makes Michael an inadvertent Cupid for Laurie.  As sick as it sounds, Michael's violent actions in the previous 24 hours have put virginal, repressed Laurie on the path to finding a prospective love interest.  After everything she's been through during that day, the poor girl genuinely deserves a break.)  The only person who does not appear to benefit from the additional scenes in the TV version is senior ambulance attendant Bud (Leo Rossi), who comes across as crass and sardonic as he does in the theatrical cut.


The additional TV scenes also help to resolve some glaring plot holes that remain unexplained in the theatrical version.  In the TV version, it is established that Laurie's parents, Mr. and Mrs. Strode, were at the Country Club Halloween party with Dr. Mixter, and that they left the party before Janet, who forgot to contact them there before going on her break, was able to reach them.  (Janet is shown in the TV version being scolded by an irritated Mrs. Alves over this.)  In the theatrical version, the nurses try to reach the Strodes to no avail.  It's never explained that one reason why they appear to be missing is because Janet forgets to call them at an opportune time.  In the second-half of the theatrical version, the hospital becomes dark and shadowy without explanation, something that I recall a few critics in print reviews complained about.  In the TV version, it is established that Michael Myers cut the power to the hospital and that the dark and shadowy lighting that results is due to the emergency generator kicking in.  And, as mentioned earlier, the TV version helps shed light on the ultimate fate of Jimmy, who appeared to lose consciousness in his car after sustaining his head injuries from his fall.  In the theatrical version, he passes out in his car in Laurie's presence.  We never get the impression that his head injuries were enough to kill him, so it is confusing at the end of the movie when the theatrical version never goes back to address what ultimately happened to him.  


However, even though the TV version helps to resolve the ultimate fate of Jimmy, it also creates its own share of flaws reflected in the fact that his scenes at the end of the film were restructured to create an entirely different impression as to how he was injured.  I much prefer the sequence of events in the theatrical version where Jimmy finds Mrs. Alves has bled to death in the hospital operating room, slips on her blood and hits his head on the hard floor, staggers to his car (where Laurie is hiding), tries to start it up to get them to safety, and loses consciousness.  The TV version has none of this.  Instead, it re-edits and reassembles the scenes and individual shots where Jimmy is seen wandering around the hospital, and slips from Mrs. Alves's blood on the ground, to create the impression that Jimmy is still wandering around looking for Laurie during the final confrontation between Dr. Loomis, Laurie, and Michael Myers, and that he sustained his head injuries from falling backwards because of the explosion Dr. Loomis sets off to kill Michael.  It simply seems lame in the TV version that Jimmy doesn't seem to notice the gunfire and shouts of excitement coming from Dr. Loomis and Laurie during their battle with Michael.  There was no need to re-edit the sequence of events just to set up Jimmy's reappearance in the ambulance at the end.  The set-up for Jimmy's reappearance was done well in the theatrical version and should have remained intact.  (I would love to find out what motivated the person at Universal in charge of preparing the TV version of "Halloween II" to make this change.) 


I also don't like the fact that the fate of Mrs. Alves, Janet, and Dr. Mixter remain unresolved in the TV version, which gives the impression that they have disappeared from the hospital without explanation.  Because of the revisions made to Jimmy's scenes in the last act, the scene where he finds Mrs. Alves strapped to the gurney, the blood drained from her body, is mostly excised from the TV version.  (You can see a brief, blink-and-you'll-miss-her shot of Mrs. Alves's lifeless body on the gurney in the quick shot used in the TV version to give the impression that Jimmy was knocked to the ground by the sheer force of the explosion at the end of the film.)  Concurrently, the scene where Janet finds Dr. Mixter's lifeless body in his office, and is then killed by Michael, is deleted entirely from the TV version.  The net result is that it gives the impression that these characters may have, inexplicably, gone AWOL in the course of the evening.  This completely contradicts what's already been established about them earlier in the film as being conscientious medical professionals.  The TV version also reassembles the sequence of events in the opening act of the movie.  Rather than starting the movie, as in the theatrical version, with a pre-titles sequence highlighting the finale of the first "Halloween," and then launching into the memorable opening credits, the TV version flips this by starting with the opening credits and then segue-ways into the closing scenes from the first film.  In so doing, we lose Dr. Loomis's hilariously blunt retort to the neighbor complaining that he had been trick-or-treated to death that night--"You don't know what death is!"--that helps kick off the sequel in high gear.


Another problem with the TV version is that it is indeed too tame for its own good.  With its re-dubbed dialogue (covering up any sort of strong language) and its toned-down violence, the TV version plays like a Movie of the Week that is too timid to really cut loose.  In addition, the sequence of the introductory scenes in the first half hour of the TV version are assembled in a manner considerably different than the theatrical cut so that its pacing and flow feel awkward in comparison.  If this was how Rosenthal's cut of the movie played, then one begins to understand why Carpenter made alterations to the movie in post production.  In that sense, I don't mind Carpenter's addition of Alice (Anne Bruner), the teenage girl left alone at home who has an unfortunate encounter with Michael Myers moments after the opening credit sequence in the theatrical version.  The scene helps to set the tone of horror and mayhem for the rest of the movie as we now see that Michael is expanding his rampage from the limited circle of characters in the first film to a wider group of individuals.  In the TV version, we briefly see Alice at home as Michael watches her from outside, but the sequence goes nowhere and proves pointless as we immediately cut back to the hospital and are left with the impression that nothing dire happened to Alice.  The exclusion of Alice's death causes the first act of the TV version to be a bit too loose and meandering for at least a half hour.  Whoever was editing "Halloween II" for television should have kept the scene in, but toned down the violence, in order to help set the tone of impending doom for the rest of the movie.


Because the TV version has its shares of considerable flaws, there is no way anyone can consider it an ideal "director's cut" that properly reflects Rick Rosenthal's (or even John Carpenter's) vision.  It is unlikely that Rosenthal intended to have the fates of Mrs. Alves, Janet, Dr. Mixter and Jimmy altered to such a drastic degree.  It is too bad that the recent Collector's Edition Blu-Ray and DVD of "Halloween II" from Scream Factory did not attempt to create an "Ideal Cut" of the movie that incorporates the best qualities of both the original 1981 theatrical cut and the later 1984 TV version into one film.  (Though I give Scream Factory big kudos for including the TV version among its considerable extras.)  It would be nice to see a version of "Halloween II" that features all of the character development scenes underscoring the camaraderie among the Haddonfield Memorial Hospital Staff, without the weird alterations to the storyline concerning Jimmy's injuries, and with the requisite R-Rated elements of strong language and violence still intact.  (However, I am fine with the notion of deleting the nudity from Pamela Susan Shoop's whirlpool bath death scene.  Even though Shoop is a lovely woman, I understand from interviews she has given that she was uncomfortable with the nudity and that that is the only element she regrets about making the movie.  The TV version edits the scene in a smooth way where the nudity is implied, but Shoop's modesty is protected.  I have no problems keeping that out, but leaving the other R-rated elements in.)  Given the continued interest and popularity in the "Halloween" series, especially this film, it is surprising that no one has considered doing the sort of "Ideal Cut" of the movie as I have suggested.  If the theatrical cut in 1981 featured both Rosenthal's character development, as well as Carpenter's effectively chilling contributions, I have a feeling that it would have been much better received by critics and openly acknowledged as a worthy follow-up to its classic predecessor. 

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Undermining a Successful "Operation (Petticoat)"


The words "Operation Petticoat" have always, to me, represented a missed opportunity.  On the one hand, with regards to the original 1959 film starring Cary Grant and directed by Blake Edwards, it represents a movie role that I wish Tina Louise (who had been offered Joan O'Brien's Lt. Crandall role) had not turned down.  On the other hand, it represents my favorite TV show when I was 5 years old.  In 1977, fresh from the success of "Charlie's Angels," ABC decided to turn the movie, about 5 attractive Army nurses who find themselves serving aboard a U.S. Navy submarine in the Pacific during World War II, into a weekly sitcom starring John Astin and Richard Gilliland.  For most of that season, it aired on Saturday nights, right after "What's Happening!" and right before "The Love Boat" and "Fantasy Island."  When I was in kindergarten, I loved the show and tuned in week after week for the latest adventures of the pink colored U.S.S. Sea Tiger, a submarine which was considered an embarrassment to the U.S. Navy, but had a rag tag crew of underdogs eager to prove their mettle against the Japanese.  That was during the first season.  In the second season ABC completely revamped the show by discharging most of its talented cast; replaced veteran producer Leonard B. Stern (whose credits included either writing or producing "The Honeymooners," "The Phil Silvers Show," and "Get Smart") with writers/producers whose most dubious contribution to society was creating "Diff'rent Strokes;" and added new cast members (including Randolph Mantooth, JoAnn Pflug, Hilarie Thompson, Warren Berlinger, and Robert Hogan) who had no chemistry and were as funny as a root canal.  All of these unnecessary changes completely botched what made the first season so charming and enjoyable.


Season One of "Operation Petticoat" worked because of the chemistry among the ensemble cast.  John Astin, taking over Cary Grant's role as Lt. Cmdr Matt Sherman, the Commanding Officer of the Sea Tiger, combined a strong sense of authority with a light-heartedly quirky comedic timing that made him both funny and believable as the submarine captain.  He was complemented every step of the way by Richard Gilliland's sly and charming Lt., j.g. Nick Holden, the ship's scheming supply officer (played by Tony Curtis in the original film).  Astin and Gilliland had a friendly, adversarial rapport on the show that was a pleasure to watch every week.  As the first season progressed, the relationship between Lt. Cmdr Sherman and Lt. Holden matured as well.  The young, scheming Holden stopped thinking of just himself and started using his skills of manipulation in order to help his shipmates and colleagues create opportunities to distinguish themselves in fighting the Japanese.  He started looking towards Sherman as a father figure/mentor from which he could learn from, and wanted very much to help Sherman make the Sea Tiger a boat that Navy senior leadership could be proud of.  In-turn, Sherman recognized how Holden simply needed guidance on how to direct his talents towards constructive goals, and enjoyed allowing Holden to use his skills to give the overlooked Sea Tiger the edge it needed to get the supplies and support it needed to fight the war.


But it didn't stop there.  Season One had a large ensemble cast that included not just the nurses, but also the other officers and enlisted personnel aboard the Sea Tiger.  In total, there were 18 regular characters each week that encompassed the ship's pharmacist, radio man, Chief Machinist's Mate, seamans, yeomans, etc.  The writers and directors of the series (most of whom worked on the similar "McHale's Navy" more than a decade earlier) did a skillful job balancing the screentime of the large cast so that everyone had an equal role and no one was ever short shrifted.  Across the span of about 23 episodes, the writers were able to give almost every character their own episode so they had an opportunity to shine.  Standing out among the supporting cast was a young Jamie Lee Curtis as the beautiful and intelligent Lt. Barbara Duran, Holden's love interest; Yvonne Wilder as the earthy and witty Maj. Edna Hayward; Melinda Naud as the klutzy, but not unintelligent, Lt. Dolores Crandall; Bond Gideon as the funny and quirky Lt. Claire Reid; Richard Brestoff as the intellectual Seaman Hunkle; Jim Varney as the sardonic Seaman Broom; Raymond Singer as the self-serving and neurotic Lt. Singer; Jesse Dizon as the inept cook Gallardo; and Jack Murdock as the irascible Chief Tostin.  They and the remaining regular cast (Dorrie Thomson, Christopher J. Brown, Kraig Cassity, Wayne Long, Richard Marion, Michael Mazes, and Peter Schuck) all made wonderful contributions to the series.  What I recall the most while watching "Operation Petticoat" was the strong sense of friendship and camaraderie between the crew members of the Sea Tiger.  Many scenes in the series are staged with the characters gathered together in a group, attempting to resolve whatever crisis is at hand.  (I particularly liked how the series had the 5 Army nurses come to see themselves as full-fledged members of the Sea Tiger crew, proactively collaborating with the Navy personnel to help fight the war.)  In contrast to other shows set in the military that emphasized one's individuality in an environment that naturally emphasizes conformity, "Operation Petticoat" stood out by underscoring the importance of teamwork and cohesion in a wartime environment.


Despite the comedic tone to "Operation Petticoat," Season One never forgot that the protagonists were in the deadly business of fighting to defeat the Japanese.  Probably the best episode of the season was the penultimate "Down to the Sea in Slips," which aired May 8, 1978.  In this episode, the crew of the Sea Tiger is felled by food poisoning while hunting for the ever-elusive Japanese battleship the Marudake.  With the men incapacitated, the Army nurses find themselves multi-tasking as they assume the crew's duties until they are able to track down and sink the Marudake.  The show makes no apologies that the Sea Tiger and its personnel have killed many Japanese sailors.  The episode is amazing considering that this was filmed just a few short years after the end of the Vietnam War, when a war-weary America turned the irreverent, pacifist "M*A*S*H" into a weekly ratings hit.  Even though it was clearly a comedy, Season One did not ignore the ultimate purpose of its characters:  to defeat the Japanese in the Pacific Theatre of the war.  In contrast, the new producers in Season Two suffered from an ailment known as Political Correctness:  they turned the Sea Tiger into a hospital ship (?!) and featured awkward, heavy-handed episodes where the crew of the Sea Tiger had to face the reality that the Japanese were human beings, just like they were.  Season Two's producers were, in essence, awkwardly attempting to enforce a revisionist 1978 view of the war upon the show.  I'm not at all trying to imply that the scripts in Season One were meant to be documentary realism, but because its characters were committed to fighting the enemy, I would posit the theory that it was, psychologically speaking, more honest about how Americans back in the early 1940s felt about fighting the Japanese while the war was actually taking place compared to the ponderous characters and storylines in Season Two.  Even though I don't think Season One of "Operation Petticoat" should be considered an overlooked classic, I do believe it was an underrated show that deserved to have a full Second Season with its cast and creative crew intact.